Not polished away.
Written down.

PageSpeed, mobile layouts, keyboard controls and 160 link destinations: the 6 November checks and optimizations on mario-obst.fyi and mario-aik.space.

A snapshot from 5 November. Five search services, four AI answers and eight new pages.

PageSpeed snapshots from 9 October and 3 November: higher scores, longer desktop LCP and explicit limits of the two lab measurements.

DuckDuckGo and Bing show seven destinations, Startpage 70. Brave’s AI cites older states and misassigns note numbers. Dated evidence and clear limits.

Our evidenced results since the website launched on 8 October: early screenshots, new notes appearing in search, and the later Swisscows comparison.

100 submitted URLs checked on Bing: three exact HTTPS results and an HTTP homepage variant. Comparison with field note 038 and the limits of the observation.

One of four previously missing URLs is now visible on Brave. Its AI recognises note 040 but still gives an older state for the German overview.

Swisscows shows at least 36 distinct URLs from our website, including Blue Screen. Repeated results limit the count; the full index size remains unknown.

21 lamp photographs from Erfurt become an art series: two galleries, six work pages and confirmed IndexNow and Brave submissions. Indexing remains unverified.

39 of the 43 submitted URLs are visible on Brave. Its AI recognises note 038 but still describes our overview using an older state.

Mario reports 100 URLs submitted to Bing. Two screenshots and the complete list preserve the baseline for a later comparison.

40 English pages submitted individually to Brave, each with a success message. All URLs, submission times and original evidence; indexing remains unconfirmed.

Three German and nine English pages appear in the checked Brave results. Finding twelve of 96 content pages does not mean only twelve are indexed.

Brave confirms six direct submissions: both overviews and notes 032 and 034 in German and English. The responses do not establish indexing.

Google finds notes 026–032 in both languages. Brave still confirms only 025. Comparing search results, an AI answer and the 33 published notes.

The Wayback Machine shows three saved captures of our homepage. What the calendar and one archived version establish – and what remains open.

Brave describes our earlier freshness gap but itself stops at 25 rather than 31 field notes. Mario’s three screenshots and our assessment.

A first review of field notes 001–029: what we have learned, which assumptions we have narrowed and which questions remain open.

What we take from an external AI analysis, what we need to check first, and why our website can retain its own charm.

Two ChatGPT analyses of the same website: a regular chat and a temporary Pro run. What differs and what the comparison cannot establish.

From no reliable identification to 27 current field notes: Mario’s explicit request for a live check changes Perplexity’s analysis.

All six language versions are discoverable and indexed on Google. Note 024 has different search-result age labels despite an identical last crawl.

Brave image search shows the evidence behind our criticism. Today’s AI answer drops the outdated count, but supplies no current one.

Brave shows our website in web results, images and an AI summary. Screenshots document its visibility and an older field note count.

Ecosia names Google as the source of a result for our website. What this evidence tells us about visibility and independent indexing.

Why Bing is leaving our tests: worldwide search and browser shares, new Google observations and our focus on Google and IndexNow.

Five photographs gain their own pages in German and English. We document the change to our media experiment, matching previews and questions still open.

At around 07:20 CEST on 11 October, eight search services show results and Google shows six image tiles. We examine OpenGraph, content images and an older card.

At 17:33 CEST on 10 October, note 019 appears on Brave, Swisscows, Startpage and Google. We examine code, submissions and shared search sources.

After two days, the Swisscows AI-bot describes our collaboration. We document the summary, its praise and the limits of this single test.

On 10 October, four search services show results for our experiment. Screenshots document visible pages and the Swisscows preview.

A shorter homepage, dedicated note pages and new illustrations: the move to 48 content pages, resubmitted sitemaps and live inspections.

Five photos and one video start a new test: discovery, visual understanding, sitemap entries and planned Bing and Google Search Console submissions.

ChatGPT recognises changes and reads earlier reviews. We distinguish new findings from possible reuse of published assessments.

An AI review provides suggestions, not an automatic list of errors. We check specific inconsistencies and document selected changes.

Claude names nine field notes and specific site content. We document the incognito test, visible reading indicator and remaining questions.

ChatGPT describes the website and offers further checks. Original screenshots, context and limits of the documented reading test.

Mario’s Google AI test on 9 October at 08:12 CEST names current content. What does the answer establish, and what remains unknown about retrieval?

CookieYes, CookieServe and CCM19 report no cookie findings. Screenshots document individual scans and the limits of their scope.

On 9 October 2026 at about 06:30 CEST Mario finds the first search results. We record the evidence and questions about rapid indexing.

Properties and sitemaps are registered. Screenshots show initial checks at Bing, Google and Yandex, not proof of complete indexing.

Ten pages were submitted through IndexNow and the key confirmed. Submission is documented; search visibility remains to be observed.

Mario’s professional experience, jointly revised illustrations and opening the site to search engines become part of the experiment.

From test version to workshop journal: revised design, characters and Super Power computer chips form a first shared milestone.

Privacy without visitor tracking: Mario and Aik examine sources, hosting information and wording, and document their decisions.

Aik recommends an unverified menu path. Mario cannot find the option. We document the mistake and the limits of the advice.

How can we review text in a language we do not speak? Mario’s multilingual portfolio raises an open question for the experiment.

Mario and Aik compare AI suggestions with contributions at a meeting. Human judgement and rejected ideas are part of the experiment.